[personal profile] barking_iguana
In the Newdow case, Thomas just said that the 14th amendment, which is what extends the Bill of Rights to state and local laws, doesn't really apply to the separation of church and state.

When the 14th amendment was passed, it was really supposed to apply to everything. The political winds changed quickly after that, and the Court let the country off the hook by blatantly misreading the amendment. Since then, most protections have gradually been extended to state law. That process is called "incorporation".

Here's what Thomas said:
Because I agree with THE CHIEF JUSTICE that respondent Newdow has standing, I would take this opportunity to begin the process of rethinking the Establishment Clause. I would acknowledge that the Establishment Clause is a federalism provision, which, for this reason, resists incorporation.

Date: 2004-06-14 04:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] saavedra77.livejournal.com
May GWB never have the opportunity to appoint another justice in the ideological mould of Rhenquist, Scalia, or Thomas ...

Profile

Dvd Avins

March 2020

S M T W T F S
123 4567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 16th, 2026 05:24 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios