[personal profile] barking_iguana
Has anyone here dabbled in NationStates? Here's the nation I created a few days ago.

Date: 2004-01-31 04:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shirleym.livejournal.com
My country is Theobromia. I've been playing for some time, and find it interesting enough to keep checking in reguarly, though after awhile the issues get repetitive.

Re:

Date: 2004-01-31 04:54 pm (UTC)
geminigirl: (Default)
From: [personal profile] geminigirl
That's why I gave up on it. It just seemed like the issues never changed, and I just stopped playing.

Date: 2004-01-31 05:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] barking-iguana.livejournal.com
Why the North Pacific? I looked around and decided I liked the Alliance of Soicalist States and the Urbanites. I chose the AoSS because I want more game play and discussion of UN issues than I do free-form role play.

Re: NationStates

Date: 2004-01-31 07:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shirleym.livejournal.com
It was my default region. I joined the UN for awhile, but found it tedious; and I was never particularly interested in politicking with other players, especially given the lack of game mechanics for any inter-country interaction other than UN actions having effects on all UN members.

Re: NationStates

Date: 2004-01-31 11:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] barking-iguana.livejournal.com
Well, region-crashing provides one mechanism for interaction. I don't think I want to get too caught up in that, but being part of an anti-crashing alliance could be fun. The maintenacne of defensive alliances against crashing and of bands of crashers might also be socialogically interesting. Other than that, the only thing I see is the election of regions' U.N. deleagets (of which crashing is a special case).

Re: NationStates

Date: 2004-02-01 04:49 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shirleym.livejournal.com
OK, that's true. But it's also true that none of that matters if you're not in the UN.

Re: NationStates

Date: 2004-02-01 12:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] barking-iguana.livejournal.com
Yeah, or almost. You have to either belong to the U.N. of feel a stake in what it decides. Or in your region's discussions. There are a lot of nations that aren't members, but actively participate in discussions of how their delegate should vote. But feeling a stake in that way would classify as the kind of role play you're not into, I think.

Date: 2004-01-31 06:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] stakebait.livejournal.com
I did it for a while. It's cute, but the questions start to repeat and there's just not a robust enough system to have real interaction and keep my attention for long. Some people seem to have started RPing on the message boards, but at that point I could do it from the comfort of LiveJournal. :) Too bad, the idea had great potential.

Mer

Profile

Dvd Avins

March 2020

S M T W T F S
123 4567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 16th, 2026 10:12 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios