[personal profile] barking_iguana
Reportedly, other than Roe. v. Wade, Palin was unable to discuss any major Supreme Court cases. (see the end of the article.)
After noting Roe vs. Wade, Palin was apparently unable to discuss any major court cases.

There was no verbal fumbling with this particular question as there was with some others, the aide said, but rather silence.
Actually, I think she was torn between sharing her brilliant refutations of Griswold v. Connecticut or Marbury v. Madison.

Date: 2008-09-30 03:29 am (UTC)

Date: 2008-09-30 04:02 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tayefeth.livejournal.com
You'd think at least Brown vs. Board of Ed would've made it into her brain at some point...

Date: 2008-09-30 05:05 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bugsybanana.livejournal.com
Abortion nutcase that she is, she should be able to remember "Dred Scott" as a dog-whistle at least...

Date: 2008-09-30 09:59 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] yolen.livejournal.com
Good grief.

Date: 2008-09-30 02:17 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Just when I was wondering how SNL would pick on her next.

Date: 2008-09-30 02:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] frisky070802.livejournal.com
Oops, I didn't intend to be anon.

Date: 2008-09-30 03:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jayeye.livejournal.com
Her ignorance of Griswold v Connecticut may explain her five children and her daughter's teen pregnancy.

Profile

Dvd Avins

March 2020

S M T W T F S
123 4567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 16th, 2026 03:47 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios